2 ms·
Yeah you're right, I didn't consider that. However even if you allocate a 16 mln array you'll only need to access ~26 different cache lines, so it might still b
by nasretdinov 3y ago
Yeah you're right, I didn't consider that. However even if you allocate a 16 mln array you'll only need to access ~26 different cache lines, so it might still be ok? That's assuming that my calculation is correct that numbers will be grouped in tens, e.g. 240-249 would be on the same cache line as their numeric values are different by just 10