4 ms·

The Israelis have killed more children in two months in Gaza than the US killed in 20 years of war in Afghanistan.

tptacek 3y ago
There's a reason it's Afghanistan people cite here, and not Iraq. Even counts of dead children aren't neutral. There's no way around taking time to learn about things; you can't sum things up with a grisly picture or a grim scorecard. Or you can, I don't know, maybe it works great. It's what we've been trying to do up 'til now. How's it going?
- differingopinio 3y ago
  The Israelis have also killed more kids in Gaza than the U.S. did in Iraq from 2008 to 2022 (according to UNICEF). https://www.unicef.org/iraq/press-releases/more-9000-children-have-been-killed-or-maimed-%E2%80%AFiraq-2008 https://www.unicef.org/iraq/press-releases/more-9000-childre...
  - ars 3y ago
    That's not even true. 5,500 children (according to Hamas) is less than 9,000 in Iraq (according to UNICEF). And around 33% of that total is from failed rockets in Gaza (based on figures collected in previous wars).
    - whatshisface 3y ago
      Sadly the troops are only in the early stages of controlling the area and that number is going to rise a lot if the war is brought to a military completion the way politicians sound like they intend to.
      - ars 3y ago
        If you check the figures most of the deaths were early in the war before people actually believed the IDF that they should move South. Once they did that civilian deaths dropped dramatically. So I don't think it's in the early stages, although this ceasefire is going to restart some elements, which is unfortunate. Hamas needs to surrender - everything they do makes life worse for Palestinians.
        whatshisface 3y ago
        I don't think Hamas is structured in a way that is able surrender, especially now that its "political" wing has totally lost whatever diplomatic or local credibility it had. It only took one month for the coalition to destroy Saddam's regime but it took eight years in all to overcome the random violence and isolated terrorist resistance. Some really bad things happened during the latter part and that's what did the most damage to America.
  - tptacek 3y ago
    I'm really not interested in lining up and correcting the scorecards, so much as I am in the broader point that what people suppose to be simple, clarifying jolts of information --- body counts, horrible photos, whatever --- don't so much clarify as nudge people towards a preferred narrative. That doesn't make them wrong. There is truth and there is falsity and for every important, complicated truth, there are people who "prefer" the narrative that conveys it. But it's not the body count that establishes the truth, it's the underlying work that went into revealing it. The truth of the situation you're intent on nudging us about is intensely complicated.
    - whatshisface 3y ago
      I am sorry but stating the truth is beyond criticism. If someone is wrong you can state a different fact that illuminates their facts, or wait until they lie, which they must do if they are sticking with the wrong ideas. You can't criticize someone for saying something that's true, and people only do so when they are losing the argument. If you're so beaten back that you're resorting to that, I will help you: Hamas killed more Israeli children than Saddam killed American children.
      - ars 3y ago
        Except he was NOT stating the truth, not even remotely close to the truth, and I replied to his post.
        whatshisface 3y ago
        I think your post is a good next post for the conversation, I am only complaining about vague methods of shifting the discussion away from facts and towards suspicions.
      - tptacek 3y ago
        In addition to the problem that the parent commenter seems to be comprehensively wrong, just as a matter of fact, they're also obviously not just stating simple facts to contribute to the body of knowledge we draw from to make our own conclusions; there is a clear subtext to the "facts" they're providing (again, scare-quoting because that's not what they are --- though, give it another month, and check again). But, more generally, you're just not responding to anything I actually wrote.
- gotoeleven 3y ago
  [flagged]
  - NomDePlum 3y ago
    There is no proof of baby beheading. Can you provide any? For the rest of your post it is so much unsubstantiated propoganda, that appears to be solely put forward to "somehow" excuse the deliberate state murder of many thousands of civilians, disproportionately children and women, in this I'm unsure whether you are the victim or the perpetrator.
    - ars 3y ago
      [flagged]
  - jhanschoo 3y ago
    Let's say for example that you are born to a family that has lived in a certain land for generations, and then the country that now rules over it does not acknowledge you as a citizen. Some terrorists take up residence in your building, and so your new country destroys it without taking sufficient precaution not to hurt civilians. Everytime I read about Israel's response, I wonder how the military might have proceeded differently if it was in developed Israeli cities that Hamas were hiding instead.
    - ars 3y ago
      > you are born to a family that has lived in a certain land for generations, and then the country that now rules over it does not acknowledge you as a citizen You are describing how Palestinians treated Jews in Israel. You do realize that Israel is the native land of the Jews for considerably more than a "few generation"? Jews have been native to Israel for more than 3,000 years. What right do Arabs have to come and colonize it? > and so your new country destroys it without taking sufficient precaution not to hurt civilians. What more precaution can they take than "leave, there's going to be a war here"? I mean seriously, what else do you want them to do? > I wonder how the military might have proceeded differently if it was in developed Israeli cities that Hamas were hiding instead. Easy. The civilians would leave, or Hamas would take them captive. But they would not stay there like some Palestinians are.
krembo 3y ago
Sir, you are posting fake news.
- differingopinio 3y ago
  You may be right. I can't find exact statistics, but I saw a few sites giving numbers of 20,000 - 30,000 (for Afghanistan). The rate of children being killed in Gaza however is far more.
  - phpisthebest 3y ago
    All of these numbers come from Hamas, is that a source you trust?
    - ceejayoz 3y ago
      They've been roughly reliable in the past. Past performance isn't guarantee of future results, of course. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/26/can-we-trust-casualty-figures-from-the-hamas-run-gaza-health-ministry https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/26/can-we-trust-c... Good discussion at https://politics.stackexchange.com/questions/82572/why-are-statements-from-the-gaza-health-ministry-taken-without-a-grain-of-salt https://politics.stackexchange.com/questions/82572/why-are-s... about the issue. A quick Googling doesn't find me a counter-estimate from Israel. Given the very clear evidence of large scale bombardment of the Gaza Strip (Israel claims 6,000 bombs dropped, and Hamas is known for favoring populated areas; https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/israel-hamas-war-gaza-strip/card/israeli-air-force-says-it-has-dropped-6-000-bombs-on-gaza-QK1aSnupiGqytMVO86PU https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/israel-hamas-war-gaza-strip...), counts in the thousands seem very plausible.
      - tptacek 3y ago
        They've already botched major events, like the death toll from PIJ's accidental strike on Al-Ahli Hospital. There's also an ongoing concern about "Gaza Health's" practice of including Hamas fighters in civilian death tolls. They're the best numbers we have or are going to get, so they can't be ignore, but their reliability is probably not a good hill to die on.
ars 3y ago
That's also not true. It seems every single thing you write isn't true. Afghanistan child deaths: 26,000 vs 5,500 in Gaza (according to Hamas).

There's a reason it's Afghanistan people cite here, and not Iraq. Even counts of dead children aren't neutral. There's no way around taking time to learn about things; you can't sum things up with a grisly picture or a grim scorecard. Or you can, I don't know, maybe it works great. It's what we've been trying to do up 'til now. How's it going?

differingopinio 3y ago
The Israelis have also killed more kids in Gaza than the U.S. did in Iraq from 2008 to 2022 (according to UNICEF). https://www.unicef.org/iraq/press-releases/more-9000-children-have-been-killed-or-maimed-%E2%80%AFiraq-2008 https://www.unicef.org/iraq/press-releases/more-9000-childre...
- ars 3y ago
  That's not even true. 5,500 children (according to Hamas) is less than 9,000 in Iraq (according to UNICEF). And around 33% of that total is from failed rockets in Gaza (based on figures collected in previous wars).
  - whatshisface 3y ago
    Sadly the troops are only in the early stages of controlling the area and that number is going to rise a lot if the war is brought to a military completion the way politicians sound like they intend to.
    - ars 3y ago
      If you check the figures most of the deaths were early in the war before people actually believed the IDF that they should move South. Once they did that civilian deaths dropped dramatically. So I don't think it's in the early stages, although this ceasefire is going to restart some elements, which is unfortunate. Hamas needs to surrender - everything they do makes life worse for Palestinians.
      - whatshisface 3y ago
        I don't think Hamas is structured in a way that is able surrender, especially now that its "political" wing has totally lost whatever diplomatic or local credibility it had. It only took one month for the coalition to destroy Saddam's regime but it took eight years in all to overcome the random violence and isolated terrorist resistance. Some really bad things happened during the latter part and that's what did the most damage to America.
- tptacek 3y ago
  I'm really not interested in lining up and correcting the scorecards, so much as I am in the broader point that what people suppose to be simple, clarifying jolts of information --- body counts, horrible photos, whatever --- don't so much clarify as nudge people towards a preferred narrative. That doesn't make them wrong. There is truth and there is falsity and for every important, complicated truth, there are people who "prefer" the narrative that conveys it. But it's not the body count that establishes the truth, it's the underlying work that went into revealing it. The truth of the situation you're intent on nudging us about is intensely complicated.
  - whatshisface 3y ago
    I am sorry but stating the truth is beyond criticism. If someone is wrong you can state a different fact that illuminates their facts, or wait until they lie, which they must do if they are sticking with the wrong ideas. You can't criticize someone for saying something that's true, and people only do so when they are losing the argument. If you're so beaten back that you're resorting to that, I will help you: Hamas killed more Israeli children than Saddam killed American children.
    - ars 3y ago
      Except he was NOT stating the truth, not even remotely close to the truth, and I replied to his post.
      - whatshisface 3y ago
        I think your post is a good next post for the conversation, I am only complaining about vague methods of shifting the discussion away from facts and towards suspicions.
    - tptacek 3y ago
      In addition to the problem that the parent commenter seems to be comprehensively wrong, just as a matter of fact, they're also obviously not just stating simple facts to contribute to the body of knowledge we draw from to make our own conclusions; there is a clear subtext to the "facts" they're providing (again, scare-quoting because that's not what they are --- though, give it another month, and check again). But, more generally, you're just not responding to anything I actually wrote.
gotoeleven 3y ago
[flagged]
- NomDePlum 3y ago
  There is no proof of baby beheading. Can you provide any? For the rest of your post it is so much unsubstantiated propoganda, that appears to be solely put forward to "somehow" excuse the deliberate state murder of many thousands of civilians, disproportionately children and women, in this I'm unsure whether you are the victim or the perpetrator.
  - ars 3y ago
    [flagged]
- jhanschoo 3y ago
  Let's say for example that you are born to a family that has lived in a certain land for generations, and then the country that now rules over it does not acknowledge you as a citizen. Some terrorists take up residence in your building, and so your new country destroys it without taking sufficient precaution not to hurt civilians. Everytime I read about Israel's response, I wonder how the military might have proceeded differently if it was in developed Israeli cities that Hamas were hiding instead.
  - ars 3y ago
    > you are born to a family that has lived in a certain land for generations, and then the country that now rules over it does not acknowledge you as a citizen You are describing how Palestinians treated Jews in Israel. You do realize that Israel is the native land of the Jews for considerably more than a "few generation"? Jews have been native to Israel for more than 3,000 years. What right do Arabs have to come and colonize it? > and so your new country destroys it without taking sufficient precaution not to hurt civilians. What more precaution can they take than "leave, there's going to be a war here"? I mean seriously, what else do you want them to do? > I wonder how the military might have proceeded differently if it was in developed Israeli cities that Hamas were hiding instead. Easy. The civilians would leave, or Hamas would take them captive. But they would not stay there like some Palestinians are.

krembo 3y ago

Sir, you are posting fake news.

differingopinio 3y ago
You may be right. I can't find exact statistics, but I saw a few sites giving numbers of 20,000 - 30,000 (for Afghanistan). The rate of children being killed in Gaza however is far more.
- phpisthebest 3y ago
  All of these numbers come from Hamas, is that a source you trust?
  - ceejayoz 3y ago
    They've been roughly reliable in the past. Past performance isn't guarantee of future results, of course. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/26/can-we-trust-casualty-figures-from-the-hamas-run-gaza-health-ministry https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/26/can-we-trust-c... Good discussion at https://politics.stackexchange.com/questions/82572/why-are-statements-from-the-gaza-health-ministry-taken-without-a-grain-of-salt https://politics.stackexchange.com/questions/82572/why-are-s... about the issue. A quick Googling doesn't find me a counter-estimate from Israel. Given the very clear evidence of large scale bombardment of the Gaza Strip (Israel claims 6,000 bombs dropped, and Hamas is known for favoring populated areas; https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/israel-hamas-war-gaza-strip/card/israeli-air-force-says-it-has-dropped-6-000-bombs-on-gaza-QK1aSnupiGqytMVO86PU https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/israel-hamas-war-gaza-strip...), counts in the thousands seem very plausible.
    - tptacek 3y ago
      They've already botched major events, like the death toll from PIJ's accidental strike on Al-Ahli Hospital. There's also an ongoing concern about "Gaza Health's" practice of including Hamas fighters in civilian death tolls. They're the best numbers we have or are going to get, so they can't be ignore, but their reliability is probably not a good hill to die on.

ars 3y ago

That's also not true. It seems every single thing you write isn't true. Afghanistan child deaths: 26,000 vs 5,500 in Gaza (according to Hamas).