> What constitutes damning? Something new? Something we didn't know already, like the fact that intelligence agencies have workers stationed in every Fortune 5

> What constitutes damning? Something new? Something we didn't know already, like the fact that intelligence agencies have workers stationed in every Fortune 500 company? Facebook, AOL and YouTube were all listed on the original PRISM leaks. If you didn't think Twitter was next, were you even paying attention? > operates under the legal theory that “public-private partnerships” where the government directs and the companies execute doesn’t count as government censorship lmao The US isn't going to surrender warrantless surveillance, ever, so good luck rallying against this. You'll need all the luck you can get, because your hardware and software manufacturers certainly won't be working in your favor. We learned that from Snowden. I got a cold, hard truth incoming to all the entrepreneurial spirits of the world; if you can be bought at a price, the US government can write an even bigger check.