>two weeks of QA, What he said was, a couple of weeks of QA, per stack, per hardware enablement. Given that new hardware is constantly being released every co

>two weeks of QA, What he said was, a couple of weeks of QA, per stack, per hardware enablement. Given that new hardware is constantly being released every couple of months, that adds up to a lot of QA. And as they said in a followup, that's "a couple of weeks" for a team of people and not just one or two. So yeah, "two (additional) weeks of QA" wouldn't be that bad, but really it's more like "two (additional) weeks of QA, multiple times a year, for a team of multiple people". And that's not insubstantial given the meager revenue opportunities in the desktop linux market.