3 ms·
I don't think that's true. See this article (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/10/science/10google.html?pagewanted=all http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/10/science/10
by drusenko 14y ago
I don't think that's true. See this article (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/10/science/10google.html?pagewanted=all http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/10/science/10google.html?page...):
----------
During a half-hour drive beginning on Google’s campus 35 miles south of San Francisco last Wednesday, a Prius equipped with a variety of sensors and following a route programmed into the GPS navigation system nimbly accelerated in the entrance lane and merged into fast-moving traffic on Highway 101, the freeway through Silicon Valley.
It drove at the speed limit, which it knew because the limit for every road is included in its database, and left the freeway several exits later. The device atop the car produced a detailed map of the environment.
The car then drove in city traffic through Mountain View, stopping for lights and stop signs, as well as making announcements like “approaching a crosswalk” (to warn the human at the wheel) or “turn ahead” in a pleasant female voice. This same pleasant voice would, engineers said, alert the driver if a master control system detected anything amiss with the various sensors.
The car can be programmed for different driving personalities — from cautious, in which it is more likely to yield to another car, to aggressive, where it is more likely to go first.
----------
Also, the Wikipedia page indicates the same: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_driverless_car http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_driverless_car