The more apt comparison would seem to be a law banning something else described as imaginary. Would anyone object as strongly to a Unicorn ban as they would to

The more apt comparison would seem to be a law banning something else described as imaginary. Would anyone object as strongly to a Unicorn ban as they would to a ban on caste based discrimination? We might think that the law is a waste in many ways, but no one could seriously object to the content of a Unicorn ban since it would have no real effect. The same would be true of explicitly making caste a protected class/race.