3 ms·
The idea is that you can have a belief and derive emotion from it without ever consciously acknowledging the belief. Aaron had some deep-down, partially-formed
by kdmccormick 3y ago
The idea is that you can have a belief and derive emotion from it without ever consciously acknowledging the belief.
Aaron had some deep-down, partially-formed belief that he worked harder than his partner Jim, without even knowing it. That subconscious belief led him to be passively aggessive.
By acknowledging that belief and the associated anger, he can now look at the belief logically and solve it. Does Aaron truly believe that he is a harder worker than Jim, and is that a problem? If so, he should talk to Jim about taking on a side job or more chores, or maybe break up with him. If not, then he should consider what might be fueling that belief. For example, Jim might work his ass off practicing and performing and cooking good food, and perhaps Aaron could do more to appreciate that.
- calf 3y agoExcept the article (seems to) claim that mere cognizance of self-denied thoughts and feelings is enough to make those "fall away", "force faded". There was no intermediate step of logic or problem solving involved. So, I don't get that magic leap argument in the article. Disclosure, I guess maybe I'm more of the "openly hostile"/IDGAF camp like some of the other commenters have expressed, so I find it harder to imagine Aaron's position where they are not even in touch/aware with their inner feelings of anger and resentment about something. Then again the author says everyone is susceptible to being passive aggressive.