> Have you stopped to ask why Assume the person you're replying to has, indeed, stopped to ask this question. What do you think are the negative consequences

> Have you stopped to ask why Assume the person you're replying to has, indeed, stopped to ask this question. What do you think are the negative consequences of prioritizing the voices of those who have been suppressed, and de-emphasizing the voices of people who more easily get to be heard? And what do you think would be the consequences of not doing so? See? Everyone can play this game. It's best to assume the other person has considered the consequences of doing/not doing this, and decided one is better than the other. It's better to explain why you think that line of thinking is wrong (if that is what you think) instead of doubting the thought processes of the person you're debating with.