3 ms·
I wonder if it would be OK to use Copilot. I use it all the time, and I think it's just a vastly superior autocomplete that should always be allowed.
by H8crilA 3y ago
I wonder if it would be OK to use Copilot. I use it all the time, and I think it's just a vastly superior autocomplete that should always be allowed.
- jimmaswell 3y agoI've been all in on copilot since I got early access. This is the future of all programming for sure, and probably a lot of other text based pursuits. And beyond text autocomplete I foresee the same idea moving into all workflows, like suggesting an entire building or city corner out of relevant prefabs once you start making a house in a game in Unity for example. Not to mention prompting the program what to do ala Star Trek.
- wadefletch 3y agoHere's the text directly from the FAQ: > Can I use AI to get on the global leaderboard? Please don't use AI / LLMs (like GPT) to automatically solve a day's puzzles until that day's global leaderboards are full. By "automatically", I mean using AI to do most or all of the puzzle solving, like handing the puzzle text directly to an LLM. The leaderboards are for human competitors; if you want to compare the speed of your AI solver with others, please do so elsewhere. (If you want to use AI to help you solve puzzles, I can't really stop you, but I feel like it's harder to get better at programming if you ask an AI to do the programming for you.) I feel like "automatically" and "handing the puzzle text directly to an LLM" imply that copilot-style, really-good-autocomplete AI is permissible, but passing the entire problem into the model isn't. There is some nuance though: sticking the problem in a comment and then letting Copilot complete it is a clear "handing text" violation, so Copilot is not 100% approved. (Edit: missing word)