IANAL but in some courts the contract has a different penalty/enforcement when money are exchanged between two parties. So in a way: going to a court the user

IANAL but in some courts the contract has a different penalty/enforcement when money are exchanged between two parties. So in a way: going to a court the user has more chances of winning when they paid for a service than when using it freely, even if using it freely means they pay with their privacy, when there is a breach of the contract. Not saying this is what Meta is doing but saying that in some cases it is better to give something away for free than to ask even 1 EUR for it.