> Well now I'm mostly going to conclude that Wayland proponents are remarkably unpleasant if you dare disagree with them. I literally just threw your own rheto

> Well now I'm mostly going to conclude that Wayland proponents are remarkably unpleasant if you dare disagree with them. I literally just threw your own rhetoric back at you. Is that an admission that you're remarkably unpleasant? > From outside, they look similar. As a user, they're functionally identical; The sort of entitlement you must have to think anyone is required to financially support your project... This is how open source works, you support the projects you like and want to succeed or that benefit you. Full stop. No one is required to fund or support a project just because it's open source and anyone is allowed to walk away from something when they feel it no longer serves their interest. If X can't survive without Redhat funneling money into it, then Redhat was the only thing keeping it alive and it's time to put it out to pasture. You may not like the thought of your project or community dying but it is 100% dishonest to characterize it as sabotage or an attack. That's the type of logic abusers use on victims.