> I believe that open source is not a panacea. For example, bio-weapons should not be open sourced. What benefits it brings to society if to restrict some but

> I believe that open source is not a panacea. For example, bio-weapons should not be open sourced. What benefits it brings to society if to restrict some but not other parties from researching bio-weapons? For example, would you be happy if some domains of Physics/Mathematics is banned for everyone except some US students of some limited set of universities?