3 ms·
Really? If there's no price at which it's ok and it's always equally unreasonable, then why bring price into it at all? Just to be clear: I think what Meta is
by jsnell 3y ago
Really? If there's no price at which it's ok and it's always equally unreasonable, then why bring price into it at all?
Just to be clear: I think what Meta is doing should be found non-compliant with the GDPR due to consent-or-pay not counting as freely given consent, but it is less of a slam dunk than it should be due to what the newspapers have been allowed to do.
But if that argument fails, complaining about the cost being too high is not going to work as a backup strategy.
- pseudalopex 3y ago> If there's no price at which it's ok and it's always equally unreasonable, then why bring price into it at all? The article brought price into it. But everyone must admit $1000 would be illegal. And €12.99 is illegal for the same reason $1000 would be illegal.