I don't see it as condescending, I see it as just factual descriptions. Of course, assuming that their research is sound. They should understand the voters' pr

I don't see it as condescending, I see it as just factual descriptions. Of course, assuming that their research is sound. They should understand the voters' profiles as well as analyze why previous policies did not yield positive results. The two are not mutually exclusive, and are very probably interrelated.