4 ms·
> In this case, the Court established that CDN services can be liable but drew the line at DNS resolvers. Imho this a misunderstanding of paragraph 9.1 of the
by Lutzb 3y ago
> In this case, the Court established that CDN services can be liable but drew the line at DNS resolvers.
Imho this a misunderstanding of paragraph 9.1 of the Telemediengesetz. The paragraph only forces caching providers to remove or block content once the original content has been blocked or removed.
- ApolloFortyNine 3y agoWouldn't that interpretation work itself out in a number of hours? CDNs are usually just a hot cache no?
- wongarsu 3y agoIf the web server sets an Expires-At header with a date far in the future, none of the rechecking headers like etag, and the CDN endpoint isn't pressed for storage (or the site is requested enough to not be evicted), why would the CDN stop serving it? Cloudflare makes this a feature, to continue serving your website even if your server is down.
- Jnr 3y agoIf Cloudflare provides a caching proxy, it isn't really known where the original content is hosted.
- immibis 3y agoThey can subpoena Cloudflare to find out.