I disagree both for German courts and US courts. This makes the assumption that the German courts care about Cloudflare’s previous actions in another country re

I disagree both for German courts and US courts. This makes the assumption that the German courts care about Cloudflare’s previous actions in another country related to removing what’s perceived as offensive content. I don’t see why they would care about this. Next, if you’re talking about US law, that doesn’t hold up either. The US doesn’t have to take into account previous activity regarding neutrality. I’m assuming the reasoning here lies in Section 230. Providers can still be held liable for the content that passes through their systems, especially if they don’t reasonably regulate what is done on their network. The $1bn verdict (that was upheld!) against Cox for piracy by their customers is something to consider. https://variety.com/2019/music/news/cox-communications-music-copyright-suit-verdict-1203449254/ https://variety.com/2019/music/news/cox-communications-music...