>According to the ruling, DDL-Music has no other purpose than to share pirated music and Cloudflare plays a central role in making the site available. And if t

>According to the ruling, DDL-Music has no other purpose than to share pirated music and Cloudflare plays a central role in making the site available. And if they switch DNS providers what will they do ? +File a lawsuit for each DNS provider? Makes no sense to "sanction" the DNS provider because of the website content. Also one other thing that plays a "centrol role" in making pirate websites available are electricity companies which provide power for servers. Shouldn't they sue those too ? >In addition to stopping its services to DDL-Music as a customer, Universal also wanted Cloudflare to block the site on its public DNS resolver 1.1.1.1. Bunch of clowns...