4 ms·

> One of NOYB's arguments is that cost is too high and thus excludes lower classes unable to pay for the subscription. Their argument for the price being to hi

> One of NOYB's arguments is that cost is too high and thus excludes lower classes unable to pay for the subscription. Their argument for the price being to high is that Facebook makes about €60 per EU user per year so setting the privacy fee to about €250 seems to be too high. Their argument, the main one, is also that consent should be freely given but if one choice is behind a paywall while the other isn't then the choice isn't freely given.

LunaSea 3y ago
> Their argument, the main one, is also that consent should be freely given but if one choice is behind a paywall while the other isn't then the choice isn't freely given. How is it not? Aren't you free to not use the solution?
- sensanaty 3y ago
  In the Netherlands, a lot of schools only communicate with parents via Whatsapp messages. How are they supposed to avoid Meta in this kind of situation? I've personally never touched a Meta product and absolutely never will (and despite this they probably still have a shadow profile of me), but this isn't a simple or even possible decision for a lot of people here.