That sentence gives no indication it is the main point of the post. It refers to a prior post and nowhere does it say anything about the current post. Even if t

That sentence gives no indication it is the main point of the post. It refers to a prior post and nowhere does it say anything about the current post. Even if the main point is indeed "the single best thing the Rust project could do for users is stabilize AsyncIterator" this sentence does not help reader understand this. In the third paragraph it makes three points: 1. This post is rebuttal to another post 2. This post argues in favour of keeping poll_next 3. This post argues that AsyncIterator should be stablized now This is the first point in the post in which it makes statements about the content of the post, and what I take to be the main points of the post.