> silly excuses. Your argument is misleading using the pretense of using logical deduction to argue that something that isn't 100% backward compatible can't b

> silly excuses. Your argument is misleading using the pretense of using logical deduction to argue that something that isn't 100% backward compatible can't be expected to replace something else. Seems more like a silly excuse to me as this argument is not based at all in reality but pure ideological delusion. Something I assume you know very well as people commenting on HN normally have a bit of experience with software development/administration.