yes and I'm seeing many of the same kind of arguments as with systemd like arguments you could re-formulate as "but my kinda uncommon setup which is irrelevan

yes and I'm seeing many of the same kind of arguments as with systemd like arguments you could re-formulate as "but my kinda uncommon setup which is irrelevant for the maintainers and sponsors of which do the decision will not work and it's bad to not support everyone for free" or "but you can't to X in that specific way and because of that you can't do so at all (ignoring alternative ways) and because of that it can't replace it at all" or "hung up on some technical detail which doesn't matter for 99% of users" or "my software which wasn't properly updated since 10 years doesn't work flawless under Wayland" or "hung up on something which wasn't supported initially but is supported since multiple years by now" in the end someone will probably continue to support Xorg and someone will probably maintain it and it probably will get increasingly more painful to run it but it also will take many years until it really hurts and it probably will be banned from most companies caring about security and people starting to use Linux in some years in the future will probably not really know what Xorg is except is that thing related to some ancient programs not behaving nicely and they will wonder what it has to do with X(Twitter) and if thats why it's no longer used.