3 ms·
So when the builder's remedy kicks in, is the city mandated to build the necessary water/sewer/electrical infrastructure for those buildings? Or is that the bui
by Tempest1981 3y ago
So when the builder's remedy kicks in, is the city mandated to build the necessary water/sewer/electrical infrastructure for those buildings? Or is that the builder's responsibility?
Who pays? (Current or future residents? Over what timeframe?)
How much new infrastructure is required for a 50 story tower like this proposal? https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/tower-housing-ocean-beach-18507790.php https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/tower-housing-ocean-b...
- Tempest1981 3y agoNot sure why my comment was interpreted negatively -- too practical? Seems like important details to solve. Maybe that's why things aren't getting done. Might make sense for the state to provide funds, since many city budgets are struggling. SF has a projected $780 million two-year deficit, last I heard.
- kjkjadksj 3y agoSan fransisco public utilities commission is already spending billions on infrastructure upgrades. Its generally cheaper to service people living in apartments than single family homes so over time per capita costs actually decrease despite necessary capacity upgrades.