3 ms·
This feels like a disingenuous interpretation rooted in some pretty strong biases.
by jjulius 3y ago
This feels like a disingenuous interpretation rooted in some pretty strong biases.
- swayvil 3y ago[flagged]
- chrisco255 3y agoThe original article is just that. "Destroying the government" is emotional hyperbole, and beyond disingenuous.
- jjulius 3y agoAt least it takes the time to expand on that idea rather than just tossing it out flippantly, eg GP.
- chrisco255 3y agoIt doesn't expand on that idea. It starts with a a click bait title and then it devolves from there. The government will survive, society will not collapse, chaos will not reign, the sky will not fall.
- readthenotes1 3y agoIt may feel like that to you, but it didn't to me (though I find your reply reflexive). The article writes in fear that the Supreme Court may decide that something the government is doing is unconstitutional without providing anything else. It neither discusses the case from a legal perspective nor provides alternatives nor shows any level of deep knowledge or access to someone with such.