2 ms·
That may fall afoul of the "reputably published" requirement at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary https://en.wikipedia.org/wi
by andrewf 3y ago
That may fall afoul of the "reputably published" requirement at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research...
Basically, Wikipedia wants a primary source's claims to be vetted by a third party, either a "reputable publisher" or a secondary source.
- nerdponx 3y agoDoesn't that disqualify just about any personal blog as a source, or any academic preprint (like on Arxiv)? I can't imagine that's widely enforced.
- 3836293648 3y agoWell, stuff like the ArXiv is exactly what they don't want cited