If "tech", as you define it here, was doing things that were good for people, would a party-apparatus publication be necessary? This is obvious, of course, but

If "tech", as you define it here, was doing things that were good for people, would a party-apparatus publication be necessary? This is obvious, of course, but rarely do socially valuable innovations require captive media to substantiate them to the body public. When the body public actually wants to hear about them, there's money to be made by educating them. Real "are we the baddies" energy here.