3 ms·
I think the problem is that he's quite correct, but the article is missing the second half of itself, where Cory explains the specifics of the so-called actual
by jaybrendansmith 3y ago
I think the problem is that he's quite correct, but the article is missing the second half of itself, where Cory explains the specifics of the so-called actual debate. I would like to see that spelled out in a much longer article instead of a rant. Oh, and the whole 'Evil begins when you treat people like things' is one of the basic rules of Deontology, the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. It's probably one of the first things I would teach the AGI.
- 8note 3y agoHis main point is that the specifics are irrelevant when it hinges on something that isn't there. The debate should instead be about something that is tangible now
- omnimus 3y agoI would say rest of his blog and his books are the missing second half (and other halfs). He is known to write A LOT. I dont think his blogposts are supposed to be fleshed out arguments but more like discussions for/with himself.