3 ms·
I was a subscriber for maybe 25 years, but the magazine got progressively light on content and heavy on ads. The articles became more like blurbs. This is sad t
by underseacables 3y ago
I was a subscriber for maybe 25 years, but the magazine got progressively light on content and heavy on ads. The articles became more like blurbs. This is sad to see but not unexpected for print media.
- huytersd 3y agoIt’s sad because you know they were internally fighting that change but just had no choice, financially.
- casefields 3y agoWe should look at this as an old long term relationship where you only remember the good times. The magazine we all grew up reading isn’t the same one it was today.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]