4 ms·
I agree with what you are saying but this was a contrived example. The effect is "too the max" and not completely thought out from a UX perspective. The downsi
by lbotos 15y ago
I agree with what you are saying but this was a contrived example. The effect is "too the max" and not completely thought out from a UX perspective.
The downsides with flash were the accessibility issues and the fact that it was a browser plugin. This is baked directly into the browser and if coded correctly I think can be used sparingly for a good effect. As much as we browse the web for content, as long as it is displayed effectively (in a static or dynamic) manner is what counts.
- novalis 15y agoYou will always find bad design and poorly thought UX. I don't like attributing fault to Flash, CSS3 or whatever next. It should be linked to who codes it in and not the platform. There is no accessibility issue with the platform you reference if it is done correctly, unfortunately you probably have been exposed to the worst it can do, still; effective content display and proper dev are separate issues.