> It’s clear that old school media _really_ does not like Musk or X and are doing anything they can to make him/them look bad. I strongly suspect confirmation

> It’s clear that old school media _really_ does not like Musk or X and are doing anything they can to make him/them look bad. I strongly suspect confirmation bias is at play. How about this article? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/18/elon-musk-to-file-thermonuclear-lawsuit-as-advertisers-desert-x https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/18/elon-musk... That certainly is not a "rocket man" is bad article. It provides context and states what why Musk would be filing a lawsuit. How about this article? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/05/elon-musk-unveils-grok-an-ai-chatbot-with-a-rebellious-streak https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/05/elon-musk... Seems very expository to me, with lots of quotes from Musk and team. How about this article? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/01/elon-musk-calls-ai-one-of-the-biggest-threats-to-humanity-at-summit https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/01/elon-musk... Which leads with the sentence: "Elon Musk, the world’s richest man; Mustafa Suleyman, co-founder of DeepMind; and King Charles among those weighing in" How about this article? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/sep/12/elon-musk-biography-eight-things-learned https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/sep/12/elon-musk... I very much could see all 8 of those points being conveyed in a much starker light, or potentially selecting different points that were all abjectly negative - rather than the relatively expository nature of the article.