3 ms·
Striking is one thing, but targeting an individual company is another. They are not striking, they are selectively denying a critical service to force submissi
by pw378 3y ago
Striking is one thing, but targeting an individual company is another. They are not striking, they are selectively denying a critical service to force submission.
It is not hard to imagine scenarios where this is weaponized with horrifying outcomes.
- InCityDreams 3y ago"It is not hard to imagine scenarios where this is weaponized with horrifying outcomes." Well, it is for me to imagine - could you expand on "horrifying"? The Mirriam W definitions don't seem to make sense when used in your particular context.
- codersfocus 3y ago“I’m a fireman. I don’t like you, so I’ll stand here while the fire burns you and your house.”
- M95D 3y agoWE are firemen. Plural. It's not the decision of a single employee.
- falserum 3y agoAnything can be weaponised with horrifying outcomes. (Your kitchen knife, radio, rats, automatic rifles, democracy) The thing to look at: actual track record (positives vs negatives). How many tragic events happened due to Swedish sympathy strikes targeting a company?