3 ms·
> This piece takes 3 paragraphs to get the point of the post. I'm not following at all. I'm curious: what do you think the "point of the post" is? Here is the
by xpe 3y ago
> This piece takes 3 paragraphs to get the point of the post.
I'm not following at all. I'm curious: what do you think the "point of the post" is?
Here is the first sentence:
> In my previous post, the single best thing the Rust project could do for users is stabilize AsyncIterator.
This is indeed the central point of the post. The rest of it explains the why.
- noelwelsh 3y agoThat sentence gives no indication it is the main point of the post. It refers to a prior post and nowhere does it say anything about the current post. Even if the main point is indeed "the single best thing the Rust project could do for users is stabilize AsyncIterator" this sentence does not help reader understand this. In the third paragraph it makes three points: 1. This post is rebuttal to another post 2. This post argues in favour of keeping poll_next 3. This post argues that AsyncIterator should be stablized now This is the first point in the post in which it makes statements about the content of the post, and what I take to be the main points of the post.