3 ms·
According to whom are they considered experts? After how the government deals with COVID I don't trust "the medical consensus" which is code for "things I want
by graphe 3y ago
According to whom are they considered experts? After how the government deals with COVID I don't trust "the medical consensus" which is code for "things I want you, the mainstream to agree with". Why would they be "experts"? What expertise do they have? It's not based on the best credentials, it's a job.
They're nameless government entities. Depending if you feel knowledge always grows you may change your ideas. Waves of ignorance litter the medical field today, as hysteria was accepted as the only disease women could have: the wandering womb theory. Consensus of ignorance is still ignorance.
There's no real evidence that high red meat is bad. There's no evidence that eating more veggies is bad.
- p_j_w 3y ago>After how the government deals with COVID I don't trust "the medical consensus" which is code for "things I want you, the mainstream to agree with" I can't believe I'm about to spend time responding to someone who opens with this, but here we go. >It's not based on the best credentials, it's a job. Where are you getting this information? Looking at the CCS guidelines, for example, one sees that the authors are MDs or PhDs at medical schools. >They're nameless government entities. Not a single one of the bodies I cited is a government entity. What are you even talking about?