4 ms·
We can look at it this way: there are ~1000 chess Grandmasters and one World Champion. It took very short time for AI to go from beating an average GM to beatin
by EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK 3y ago
We can look at it this way: there are ~1000 chess Grandmasters and one World Champion. It took very short time for AI to go from beating an average GM to beating World Champion.
There are ~1000 MO winners and 1 (one) Millenial problem solver ...
- auntienomen 3y agoWe can. But doing so frames math research as the same sort of activity as math problem solving.. it's not. Many imo champions struggle to do any successful math research. And many successful math researchers (e.g., all of the most recent batch of Fields medallists) never did the Oympiad at all.
- EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK 3y agoYet the one and only Millenial problem solver was a MO winner too, so there is some overlap.
- auntienomen 3y agoSample size 1. Here's what Andrew Wiles, the only other person to have solved a Millennium-class problem has to say of math competition: "Let me stress that creating new mathematics is a quite different occupation from solving problems in a contest. Why is this? Because you don't know for sure what you are trying to prove or indeed whether it is true."
- EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK 3y agoSample size > 1 for sure, Terence Tao comes to mind, as well as Dr. Maryam Mirzakhani. Nobody argues it's the same, after all MO problems are designed to be solved in ~an hour, but we are talking about mental capabilities.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]