3 ms·

Found some here: https://github.com/biomejs/biome/blob/main/benchmark/README.md https://github.com/biomejs/biome/blob/main/benchmark/README.... They claim 25x

Found some here: https://github.com/biomejs/biome/blob/main/benchmark/README.md https://github.com/biomejs/biome/blob/main/benchmark/README.... They claim 25x but the numbers are old so I'm not sure if I believe them now that a bunch of new functionality has been added. Either way, if it's anywhere within that ballpark it's still a huge achievement.

conaclos 3y ago
This heavily depends on your workstation. Biome scales very well. With 16 threads on a i7-120P, I got the following figures: Webpack repository: Biome ran 2.19 ± 0.11 times faster than dprint 4.18 ± 0.14 times faster than Biome (1 thread) 32.12 ± 1.18 times faster than Prettier 32.45 ± 2.56 times faster than Parallel-Prettier I am not sure why Parallel-Prettier is slower than Prettier for the webpack repository. Prettier repository: Biome ran 1.89 ± 0.21 times faster than dprint 3.47 ± 0.34 times faster than Biome (1 thread) 36.70 ± 3.41 times faster than Parallel-Prettier 46.66 ± 4.32 times faster than Prettier