3 ms·
That’s the key problem though, in the face of alternative hypothesis they fail to even acknowledge they may be wrong. Coupled with the intense lobbying
by spacephysics 3y ago
That’s the key problem though, in the face of alternative hypothesis they fail to even acknowledge they may be wrong. Coupled with the intense lobbying
- AlexandrB 3y agoLobbying by whom? The beef industry certainly does a lot of lobbying itself[1]. [1] https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2017/03/wheres-the-beef-meat-lobby/ https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2017/03/wheres-the-beef-mea...
- Vegenoid 3y agoLobbying from the veggie industry persuading doctors to tell people to eat less meat and cheese?
- p_j_w 3y ago>That’s the key problem though, in the face of alternative hypothesis they fail to even acknowledge they may be wrong. That is not they key problem as you originally laid out. Your original position is that they key problem is they ARE wrong. Further, I don't know that I've ever read any sort of paper or written guidelines that explicitly says "we might be wrong here." Should those all be ignored for that reason? The papers you yourself cited in a comment above don't explicitly say they may be wrong, yet you have no problem taking them as 100% established fact. This seems like a bit of a double standard and sloppy logic. >Coupled with the intense lobbying Do you have evidence for corruption in these institutions?