4 ms·
I was actually just looking at that after posting this (lit is new to me). That's a pretty cool solution. I'd still prefer an option to have the html in its own
by itslennysfault 3y ago
I was actually just looking at that after posting this (lit is new to me). That's a pretty cool solution. I'd still prefer an option to have the html in its own file, but that is just my taste. I know a lot of people feel exactly the opposite.
- claytongulick 3y agoMaybe a bit pedantic - but I prefer using lit-html, not lit. Lit is a bit too "frameworky" for my taste, I generally just use vanilla classes that extend HTMLElement and have a render function that renders the lit-element template to the light dom. Something like: import {html, render} from 'lit-html'; class AppComponent extends HTMLElement { connectedCallback() { this.template = () => html`<markup here>`; this.render(); } render() { if(this.template) render(this.template(), this) } } customElements.define('app-component', AppComponent);
- itslennysfault 3y agoPerfect, and perfect timing. I was recently tasked with creating a small standalone web app and everything feels like overkill to me. This might be the perfect fit. Thanks for the explanation.