3 ms·
Not OP, but prettier doesn't break template literals, but it will break non-literal sections of template strings. For example, if we wrote this: const foo
by sarahdellysse 3y ago
Not OP, but prettier doesn't break template literals, but it will break non-literal sections of template strings. For example, if we wrote this:
const foo = `aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa${bbbbbbbbbbbbb}ccccccccccccccc${ddddddddddd}`;
prettier would fix it to
const foo =
`aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa${
bbbbbbbbbbbbb
}ccccccccccccccc${
ddddddddddd
}`;
(or something similar) and it would be fully equivalent.
I don't like it doing that either tbh but hey prettier is good enough in most cases its worth putting up with it
- bakkoting 3y agoI have a PR fixing that specific issue: https://github.com/prettier/prettier/pull/15209 https://github.com/prettier/prettier/pull/15209 Just needs another maintainer's stamp.