Good article. I like the way they have divided the article into 'surveillance', 'censorship' and 'existing laws' (basically 'libel'), however I don't think they

Good article. I like the way they have divided the article into 'surveillance', 'censorship' and 'existing laws' (basically 'libel'), however I don't think they have made the most of actually treating them as separate issues. To me, being able to bring a libel case against someone who deliberately spends their time slandering your name on the internet is one kind of law. Having a panel of people who decide what information you are and aren't allowed to access is something quite different.