3 ms·
> OK, just democracy then. Try me. How open are you to a counter-culture whose unironic goal is literally overthrowing the "democratic" regime we live under, r
by mistermann 3y ago
> OK, just democracy then. Try me.
How open are you to a counter-culture whose unironic goal is literally overthrowing the "democratic" regime we live under, replacing it with something genuinely democratic?
> I won't call you an employee of Putin unless you're proposing to replace democracy with feudalism, and even then I wouldn't do it....
My intuition suggests you are speaking not just honestly, but also truthfully. But I've spent a lot of time on forums arguing culture war issues, and rarely do those who say things like this say it truthfully (which can typically be discovered via a simple examination of their comment history). The distinction between truthfulness and lying is crucially important here, because while it is nice that people are sincere, if they are unable(!) to care about this important distinction, the odds of improving seem low (to solve a problem, one must first realize that one has a problem in the first place).
> I'd rather ask why you would think a political system based on dominance hierarchies in barnyard animals could still be suitable for collections of millions to billions of wrinkled-cortex apes...)
Oh don't worry, I don't.....even if that system was genuine (which ours is not).
Some variation of this general structure though...
- 082349872349872 3y agoWhat variation? (and how does it address the "genuine" problem?)
- mistermann 3y ago> What variation? The one with maximal utility. >(and how does it address the "genuine" problem?) By optimizing matters. A good place to start is accepting that there may be no Oracles among us so we have to figure things out on our own, if that is what we desire....but we do not necessarily have to.