5 ms·
"Deep Neural Networks Module: $150k" seems kind of unecessary. Torch/tensorflow already fills that niche so well.
by nuz 3y ago
"Deep Neural Networks Module: $150k" seems kind of unecessary. Torch/tensorflow already fills that niche so well.
- fleischhauf 3y agoagreed, they should just have a good interoperability
- londons_explore 3y agoI think this $150k is just for building that interoperability. At today's salaries, that pays for, what, 1 month of some ML engineers time to integrate all the big ML frameworks into OpenCV? Doubt you could do any decent job of it in a month...
- wokwokwok 3y agoLlama.cpp and the entire ecosystem around it show that there’s clearly space for more than torch in this space. Why would opencv, the all singing all dancing C++ computer vision framework not have a DNN module? Why would it say “use a Python library”? (And yes, torch is deprecating its c++ support). Not having it would be strange.
- synergy20 3y agowhat do you mean by saying "pytorch is deprecating c++"
- wokwokwok 3y agoDo your own research. Here’s a starting point: https://discuss.pytorch.org/t/pytorch-2-and-the-c-interface/168034 https://discuss.pytorch.org/t/pytorch-2-and-the-c-interface/...
- formerly_proven 3y ago> Why would opencv, the all singing all dancing C++ computer vision framework not have a DNN module? https://docs.opencv.org/4.x/d2/d58/tutorial_table_of_content_dnn.html https://docs.opencv.org/4.x/d2/d58/tutorial_table_of_content... In particular, OpenCV DNN is as far as I know the fastest CPU implementation for darknet/yolo networks.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- papruapap 3y agoIsn't C++ support quite minimal for both?
- DonHopkins 3y agoIt would be nice to have a high level API with all the plumbing for integrating different popular deep neural network libraries like torch/tensorflow, like how Unity has ARFoundation for integrating ARCore, ARKit, Magic Creep, and HoboLens.