> But... surely that code is far more "insanely stupid[-looking]" than the first...? I don't think anyone is arguing that x\n!p is a good way to write code. C

> But... surely that code is far more "insanely stupid[-looking]" than the first...? I don't think anyone is arguing that x\n!p is a good way to write code. Crockford is pointing out that ASI will not occur when ! is an infix operator.