4 ms·
The 'latest revision of the future specification' you link to is, I think, the set of things the TC39 group has considered and agreed on. The list of things the
by thristian 15y ago
The 'latest revision of the future specification' you link to is, I think, the set of things the TC39 group has considered and agreed on. The list of things they are currently considering is in the strawman namespace[1] on that wiki. In particular, the "strawman:concurrency" page[2] currently says:
The infix “!” operator: An eventual analog of “.“, for making eventual requests look more like immediate requests.
[1]: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:strawman http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:strawman
[2]: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:concurrency http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:concurrency
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- xiaomai 15y ago> But... surely that code is far more "insanely stupid[-looking]" than the first...? I don't think anyone is arguing that x\n!p is a good way to write code. Crockford is pointing out that ASI will not occur when ! is an infix operator.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]