3 ms·
I'll take that as "nothing." Marx's analysis on the accumulation of capital has nothing to do with Malthus. You haven't even answered my question. Why would I
by xkekjrktllss 3y ago
I'll take that as "nothing." Marx's analysis on the accumulation of capital has nothing to do with Malthus.
You haven't even answered my question. Why would I waste my time?
That said, Marx was a 19th century economist. Just like every other 19th century economist, he did not have a time machine and did not predict neoliberalism or modern financialized economies, which are still in their first test run. Hold your horses, sweetheart.
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> Marx's analysis on accumulation of capital has nothing to do with whatever you're talking about What do you think it's about? Because I'm quoting from his work and its relevant Wikipedia article.
- ffgjgf1 3y ago> You haven't even answered my question. Why would I waste my time? A better question is why’d you’d try to waste other peoples time with your silly irrelevant responses? > Marx's analysis on the accumulation of capital has nothing to do with Malthus. Just as (well less to be fair) it’s only tangentially related to the issues we’re facing.