4 ms·
That is my point, more or less. What you're describing is just about the best case scenario. Facebook was not abiding Myanmar's laws during the genocide. The f
by droopyEyelids 3y ago
That is my point, more or less. What you're describing is just about the best case scenario.
Facebook was not abiding Myanmar's laws during the genocide. The flagrant disregard for the harm they were causing, while being told they were causing it by the government plus multiple NGOs was one of the bigger parts of the series. The government stopped the earlier violence by blocking Facebook during riots.
New technologies that organize information and people are a boon to radical groups. Putting some sort of layer of lawfulness over that is a benefit, even if imperfect.
And the whole thing OpenAI was trying to do was go a step further and make it beneficial to all humanity, which implies the goal is to make the AI less harmful to people even if the law permits the harm.