¿Por que no los dos? It NEVER hurts to know the radio-ins for scenes and if inaccurate information is given, if something unbecoming is shared to one officer by

¿Por que no los dos? It NEVER hurts to know the radio-ins for scenes and if inaccurate information is given, if something unbecoming is shared to one officer by another, if there is conspiracy to participate in the blue wall of silence [1], and many more scenarios. Indeed, this information can transpire in court, but it shouldn't be the People's only avenue to RECEIVE such intel. If this were to be the case, the courts would have leverage to transparency, whereas the People should have both. You shouldn't NEED the court to start your search on proving damage from the State. You don't NEED to wait for a courthouse summons to know your rights were violated. If your prerequisites to be upset are explicitly the actions and behaviors that occur in judicial proceedings, then this country is far gone. If that's the one area you want to protect to the largest extent, then bad actors will use every other step before that one (including arrest) against you - and that's where radio comms come in. 1 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_wall_of_silence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_wall_of_silence