I agree with Cave's perhaps overly dramatized response. But overall it's a response to a very early misinterpretation of what statistics-based models are for. S

I agree with Cave's perhaps overly dramatized response. But overall it's a response to a very early misinterpretation of what statistics-based models are for. Sure, they are capable of producing an output that looks like a product of human creativity, but so are e.g. chance-based techniques (dice rolling to pick a sequence of notes in a scale). LLMs should and will be used as tools, they won't replace human creativity in any meaningful sense.