This is not how language works and this type of argument is, at best, silly. You talk about science as though it isn't applied empirical philosophy with plenty

This is not how language works and this type of argument is, at best, silly. You talk about science as though it isn't applied empirical philosophy with plenty of caveats. You can't treat economics with a significant gap between theory and reality... in the same way that we treat physics as a theoretical study of the external world with significant gaps between theory and reality.