> I would bet good money that if GPT-3.5 could have magically interacted with those 1966 participants, it would have fooled most of them, as it would have been

> I would bet good money that if GPT-3.5 could have magically interacted with those 1966 participants, it would have fooled most of them, as it would have been inconceivable for a computer to exhibit such capabilities then. You cannot just "fool" someone in the Turing test, the interrogator knows one of the two partners is a computer. To pass you need to perform better than your human companion. Whether the interrogator knows of the existence of advanced auto-complete systems is not very important in this setup. He knows of existence of fellow humans and needs to identify one when he meets him.