3 ms·
I genuinely believe both parties should want to buy/sell for a valid contract. People make mistakes and just because it's a big anonymous company to the author
by whatareyousure 3y ago
I genuinely believe both parties should want to buy/sell for a valid contract.
People make mistakes and just because it's a big anonymous company to the author doesn't mean there are people behind mistakes.
- seabass-labrax 3y agoThat is indeed the law in the UK, and applied to this story. The key thing here is that the customer ('MM') explicitly entered their side of the contract by clicking 'purchase' and providing payment details on HP's website. HP could have declined at this point: their original email and special offer website was only an 'invitation to treat'. But in sending an order confirmation message to MM, HP had chosen to sell - and thus made a valid contract. Perhaps HP should have a human representative approving each offer and entering into contracts manually. However, I can't see that being likely or (from HP's point of view) entirely satisfactory.
- whatareyousure 3y agoPerhaps people should be more understanding.