3 ms·
Ehh, these "good/bad" charts often have to follow a specific narrative to make sense, like those Windows ones that pick only certain versions among the NT and n
by tavavex 3y ago
Ehh, these "good/bad" charts often have to follow a specific narrative to make sense, like those Windows ones that pick only certain versions among the NT and non-NT systems for it to follow the pattern. Same for Nintendo - what was the "bad" between NES and SNES?
- scheeseman486 3y agoFDS maybe? Didn't make it outside of Japan, but it was enough of it's own platform/ecosystem that it could count if you stretched the definition far enough.
- tavavex 3y agoI think it's pretty reasonable to assume that a console is a standalone device. Sure, the FDS had its own games, but it inherently relies on the Famicom to function and is more or less just an upgrade kit for that console.
- scheeseman486 3y agoThere was the Twin Famicom, but that was made by Sharp. Still, it underlines that Nintendo's output isn't all hits and never has been. Their add-ons in particular are usually busts.